Science & Democracy Resources

Over the past decade, the House Science Committee has called more industry witnesses and fewer independent scientists to its hearings.

The 2014 Lewis M. Branscomb Forum brought together experts, advocates, and engaged community members to explore how science can help advance healthier food environments.

A long history of sidelining science took a turn for the better when Hoboken's leaders decided to take an evidence-based approach in responding to 2012's Hurricane Sandy.

Communities need reliable information to make good decisions about hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") and other unconventional oil and gas development technologies.

Food safety disasters like the Listeria outbreak of 2011 are more common than they should be.

The 2013 Lewis M. Branscomb Forum convened big thinkers from academia, industry, government, non-governmental organizations, and citizen groups to delve into some of the most complex challenges around fracking.

UCS's 2013 report, Grading Government Transparency, looks at policies governing scientists' communications through traditional and social media at 17 federal agencies.

In this 2013 study, the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists looks at the climate-related statements and policy positions of 14 industry trade groups, finding a wide range of views and behaviors.

The U.S. response to the SARS epidemic of 2002-03 is a good example of the partnership between science and democracy working effectively.

This is the first in the Lewis M. Branscomb Science Democracy Forum series. It set out to identify and advocate for ways to improve access to governmental scientific information.

Representations of climate science on Fox News Channel and in the Wall Street Journal opinion pages are overwhelmingly misleading