Turning Soils into Sponges

A devastating problem that's getting worse

In the United States, floods and droughts together have done damage worth an estimated $340.4 billion since 1980. And farmers and ranchers are among the most affected, as floods and droughts devastate livestock, crops, and soil.

Taxpayers share in the burden through subsidized federal crop insurance programs. Insurance payouts due to floods or droughts totaled $38.5 billion between 2011 and 2016—and that bill is expected to keep rising as climate change brings more extreme weather.

The impacts of these disasters aren't confined to farmers or the taxpayers who insure them. Communities located downstream from farming regions feel the effects as well, as floods damage homes, businesses, and infrastructure.

Spongy soils to the rescue

Farmers can't make it rain—or make it stop. But they can do things to make their land less vulnerable to the effects of extreme weather.

Over the past several decades, agriculture has moved increasingly toward systems dominated by a few annual crops—typically corn and soybeans—often with fields left bare between growing seasons. This trend has degraded soil structure, leaving it less like a sponge and more like concrete, which exacerbates the damage done by floods and droughts. To combat these impacts, farmers have tried options such as investing in irrigation equipment or drainage systems. But these aren't always long-term solutions, and they can have damaging effects of their own.

There's a better way: get to the root of the problem by building healthier soils with a sponge-like ability to hold water. Several farming practices have been linked to improved soil health, and they share one thing in common: they keep plants with living roots in the soil year-round.

What the report found

Incorporating more than 150 field-scale experiments from six different continents, the analysis evaluates the impact of specific practices on soil properties such as the rate at which water moves into and through soil (infiltration rate), the spaces between soil particles (pore space or “porosity”), and the amount of water made available to plants. The authors identify "continuous living cover," which can be achieved through incorporating deep-rooted perennials, cover crops, consistently and effectively improving soil health.

The report then then shows how flood and drought outcomes could improve if continuous living cover practices were adopted on a large scale in a representative Midwestern farm state—in this case, Iowa—starting with regions of the state that are already the least productive and most at risk of erosion.

Some of the report's findings:

• Keeping soil unplowed and covered with living plants increased its ability to absorb water in 70 percent of the field studies analyzed.
• Water infiltration rates improved by 59 percent with perennial crops, 35 percent with cover crops, and 58 percent with improved grazing practices.
• Converting approximately one-third of Iowa’s cropland—today’s least-profitable and most-erodible acres—to perennial crops, or to corn or soybeans grown with a winter cover crop, would result in significant water savings. It would have reduced water runoff in recent extreme weather events by up to 20 percent and flood frequency by the same amount.
• During devastating droughts in 1988 and 2012—each of which caused more than $30 billion in damage—adoption of soil-improving practices would have made as much as 16 percent more water available for crops to use.

Recommendations

The practices highlighted in the report could bring significant benefits to farmers, taxpayers, and surrounding communities. But there are also significant barriers to their adoption, including up-front costs and the need for training and technical assistance. More research is also needed to help farmers optimize soil-improving practices for the specific crops, soils, and weather conditions they work with.

To help overcome these barriers, the report offers several policy recommendations:

• Expand incentives and strengthen up-front financial support for farmers to help them adopt soil management practices that deliver flood and drought resilience. This includes strengthening support for good soil management practices in the federal Conservation Stewardship Program, facilitating state and regional solutions through the Regional Conservation Partnership Program, and encouraging collaborative solutions through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program.
• Provide incentives in the federal crop insurance program to reduce flood and drought risks up-front through good soil management. This includes incorporating soil quality and management metrics into insurance premium calculations, improving enforcement of minimum conservation requirements for policy holders, incorporating ecological principles, and encouraging diversified farms by promoting whole farm insurance policies rather than insuring one crop at a time.
• Invest in research to optimize the benefits of incorporating perennials and other soil management practices into a wide variety of agricultural landscapes.